Strap yourself in for my top ten reasons why you need to know about Behavioural Economics. More slap down than count down, prepare to be insulted!
You need Behavioural Economics because...
1. You're arrogant
You think other people succeed because of the situation but you succeed because you're ace. But when things go wrong, it's the situation for you but a deep personal flaw in others. After all, you never cut people off in traffic, but get cut off all the time. (a.k.a. Actor Observer bias)
2. You're lazy
When you don't know what to do, you do nothing. Inertia is your friend and default is your home. The easiest position is to stay with what you know. That's why you haven't changed banks...car insurance...partners yet. (a.k.a Status Quo)
3. You take short cuts
Who can be bothered with all that thinking? Do what you've done before or just make some assumptions. If you remember seeing that brand advertised, then it must be reputable. If one product is more expensive than another, it must be better. You'll order wine from the middle of the price range because you don't want to look stingy. (a.k.a. Heuristics or Rules of Thumb)
4. You delude yourself
You love your thinking so much that whenever you look for evidence to support your point of view you can find it easily. (a.k.a Confirmation bias)
But when someone else puts forward an idea, it always seems to have more down sides. (a.k.a. Not Invented Here Bias).
5. You're a sheep
When you don't know what to do you follow what other people are doing. Ever lined up in a queue without knowing what it was for? Gone to a restaurant because it always seemed busy? Bought ill-fitting fashion? An SUV? (a.k.a Herding)
6. You're scared
Losing is scarier than winning. Bird in the hand and all that. Safer to do nothing (as per point 2) or demand over the top guarantees before you'll make a move. Stayed in a job too long? Held on to an investment even though it was tanking? Gone to a petrol station out of your way because you want to save $2 with your shopper docket? (a.k.a. Loss aversion)
7. You're superficial
You operate most of the time at a superficial, top of mind level. Listing 3-5 reasons you like or dislike something is easy because but beyond that gets tricky. It causes you a bit of mental anguish because you start to second guess your 'gut' feeling. (a.k.a. Availability bias)
And you want rewards NOW! Just like Veronica Salt in Willy Wonka (I want it now Daddy!) you hate to wait because you are not very good at imagining what the future will be. (a.k.a. Short term bias)
8. You're not in control of your own mind
You set the alarm and then hit snooze. You intend to go to the gym but stay glued to the couch watching the Big Bang Theory. You know superannuation is important but somehow can't find 10 minutes to read the brochure. You are constantly fighting with yourself as your mind processes intent and actual behaviour. This inner turmoil exhausts you so you revert to short-cuts (see point 3) and status quo (see point 2). (a.k.a. System 1 and System 2 thinking)
9. You fall for obvious tricks
You buy the yogurt that is 97% fat free instead of the yogurt that has 3% fat. You pay for broadband plans with data quantities you will never reach. You buy the shirt because it is marked down to half price. You know you know that you are being tricked by the way something is communicated, but you can't help falling for it. (a.k.a. Framing)
So that is you. But don't worry, it's you and me and everyone else because we are beautifully complex, emotional and cognitive beings and being irrational is what we do. The important lesson for anyone in business is that you need strategies and systems geared around this irrationality so you can best meet the needs of your market. It's pretty clear that many businesses have not yet come to terms with the opportunity Behavioural Economics presents, so it's your chance to shake off your status quo bias, squash your fear of losing and instead grab on to a field that can deliver significant competitive advantage.
Oh. I almost forgot.
10. You need completion
You see a gap and you need to fill it. A list of 10 with only 9 items becomes annoyingly distressing. Failing to finish means you miss out on the entirety of the experience, so you go through with it even if there is no point. (a.k.a. Completion)
Happy irrationality.
PS If you like my blog, I'd love you to consider supporting my fundraising trek of the Larapinta trail. Every bit helps so to find out more, visithttps://www.gofundraise.com.au/page/BriforICV Thank you!
Showing posts with label not invented here bias. Show all posts
Showing posts with label not invented here bias. Show all posts
Monday, April 2, 2012
The Top 10 Slap Down: Why you need Behavioural Economics
Tuesday, September 13, 2011
Why we hide behind big, boring reports
I recently read an interesting piece called "Tell Me Something I Don't Know-Why MR is Comprehensive, Accurate, and Often Boring" in which the author Yi Kang laments the dull and contrived nature of most market research.
But when asked if the supporting research made a difference in the business decision (not feeling good but having impact). A very different picture emerged. “Making a difference” requires market research to do at least one of two things: say something new or say something contrarian."
"Turns out that big, thick tomes of information do serve a purpose – making people feel good. In a recent survey, business executives were most confident in a decision being “well thought out” when the supporting research was “comprehensive” and “accurate."
But when asked if the supporting research made a difference in the business decision (not feeling good but having impact). A very different picture emerged. “Making a difference” requires market research to do at least one of two things: say something new or say something contrarian."
Wednesday, June 22, 2011
McDonald's coffee guy; why complainers are hot
Bad coffee. For Melburnians, it is one of the sins along with disinterest in the weather and the absence of black clothing. And so, McDonalds has launched its attempt to win custom back from people disgruntled by their burnt beans and insipid froth. Complaints, or more likely, declining sales have pushed McDonalds to admit it was dishing out bad product.
Have you come across the TV ad? It centers on a gentleman seen arguing with a bus driver. The scene is set that this fellow lives for complaining. And yet, there he later sits enjoying a McDonalds brew without complaint.
What I find interesting about the ad is the portrayal of complainers. This guy is a world weary, grey skinned, relatively unattractive man. Whilst McDonalds could have snaffled Hugh Jackman or a Cleo bachelor to play the role, that would have confused the message. McDonalds are inferring that complaints are an ugly behaviour, and that complainers are unattractive.
This is an interesting heuristic that is entrenched in most businesses. The link between "complaints = problem = negative = cost = seek to eliminate" is extremely strong. And this is where a fear of social media rears its head. As long as you see complaints as a negative thing to be reduced, you are cutting yourself off from the best market feedback you can get.
I know, I know. You are going to say that customers are your priority, you take them seriously and you even monitor satisfaction. But I would guess that the governing bias is still that when a complaint is received, it is seen as a problem for your business, not an opportunity. Why? Two principles from Behavioural Economics are at play.
Not Invented Here Bias - we have a tendency to shun the ideas of others. Working as a product manager, I certainly fall into the trap of thinking I know more than my customers...and I do, but about what the widget should do, not how that customer is experiencing it. My subjective view must not blind me to the relatively objective view offered by the customer.
Status quo bias - it's more comfortable for us in the status quo. A complaint might mean we have to step out of our rut and life might get more challenging. But here's the thing. Status quo is a misnomer in any market; you cannot stay stagnant because the world is not, and the complaints you receive are the market's way of telling you to get moving.
So here's my challenge to us all. When you next receive a complaint, I want you to imagine the person has the charm and looks of Hugh Jackman rather than the washed-out McDonalds man. And I want you to take a deep breath, relax your shoulders, and absorb the gift of real-life market feedback.
PS as an aside, McDonalds is offering a free replacement coffee if you are dissatisfied with the brew. A classic example of overcoming loss aversion by convincing customers they have nothing to lose (except of course their time).
Image from: http://static.rbi.com.au/Uploads/PressReleases/hosp/thumbnails/Images-20110602/Maccas2.jpg
Have you come across the TV ad? It centers on a gentleman seen arguing with a bus driver. The scene is set that this fellow lives for complaining. And yet, there he later sits enjoying a McDonalds brew without complaint.
What I find interesting about the ad is the portrayal of complainers. This guy is a world weary, grey skinned, relatively unattractive man. Whilst McDonalds could have snaffled Hugh Jackman or a Cleo bachelor to play the role, that would have confused the message. McDonalds are inferring that complaints are an ugly behaviour, and that complainers are unattractive.
This is an interesting heuristic that is entrenched in most businesses. The link between "complaints = problem = negative = cost = seek to eliminate" is extremely strong. And this is where a fear of social media rears its head. As long as you see complaints as a negative thing to be reduced, you are cutting yourself off from the best market feedback you can get.
I know, I know. You are going to say that customers are your priority, you take them seriously and you even monitor satisfaction. But I would guess that the governing bias is still that when a complaint is received, it is seen as a problem for your business, not an opportunity. Why? Two principles from Behavioural Economics are at play.
Not Invented Here Bias - we have a tendency to shun the ideas of others. Working as a product manager, I certainly fall into the trap of thinking I know more than my customers...and I do, but about what the widget should do, not how that customer is experiencing it. My subjective view must not blind me to the relatively objective view offered by the customer.
Status quo bias - it's more comfortable for us in the status quo. A complaint might mean we have to step out of our rut and life might get more challenging. But here's the thing. Status quo is a misnomer in any market; you cannot stay stagnant because the world is not, and the complaints you receive are the market's way of telling you to get moving.
So here's my challenge to us all. When you next receive a complaint, I want you to imagine the person has the charm and looks of Hugh Jackman rather than the washed-out McDonalds man. And I want you to take a deep breath, relax your shoulders, and absorb the gift of real-life market feedback.
PS as an aside, McDonalds is offering a free replacement coffee if you are dissatisfied with the brew. A classic example of overcoming loss aversion by convincing customers they have nothing to lose (except of course their time).
Image from: http://static.rbi.com.au/Uploads/PressReleases/hosp/thumbnails/Images-20110602/Maccas2.jpg
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Status quo bias – comfort in sticking to what we know, and
Loss aversion – being more fearful of losing what we have than risking a gain
There’s a lot of comfort in a big, professional document because that implies safety, thoroughness and, frankly, that someone else has done the thinking so we don’t have to. (It also helps to justify the expense on the research because quantity still trumps quality a lot of the time in perception management).
Of course it's not just market research that taps into our desire for credibility. Just think about the business documents and spreadsheets we slave over that your boss may not even read. Executive summaries are there for a reason after all.
The other interesting thing we can draw from behavioural economics is the “not invented here” bias that we are subject to – in this case it explains why a lot of those research findings don’t go anywhere. To get traction, the stakeholders need to be part of the insights generation phase, otherwise the outputs are likely to be filed away in a drawer.
So what's the answer? How about we take some chances and throw away the templated documents, the proforma Powerpoint presentations, the phone book sized research reports and instead throw some reflections up on a whiteboard to discuss, challenge, laugh about, but ultimately get stimulated enough to take action? Getting your researchers to evoke insights rather than yawns? Sounds good to me.
Image from http://jameswoodward.files.wordpress.com/2008/08/piles_of_paper_small.jpg?w=200&h=239